## Naming matters | Pydon't 🐍

In this Pydon't you'll learn the importance of using good names and I'll give some tips to help you.

(If you are new here and have no idea what a Pydon't is, you may want to read the Pydon't Manifesto.)

# Introduction

Names are like real estate in our brains. They are labels we give to things, concepts, ideas, objects, so that it is easier for us to refer to those things, but they take up space. As it turns out, we can only hold a very small number of different ideas in our heads, so these labels are very expensive...

We might as well do the best job we can to manage them as well as possible!

In this Pydon't, you will:

• learn about some naming conventions;
• learn the suggested naming conventions for Python code; and
• understand some do's and don'ts for naming variables, functions, methods, etc, in Python.

# Naming conventions

When we talk about names, there are two things that need to be discussed. One of them is the actual name that you give to things, and the other is the way in which you write the name: the casing of the letters and how consecutive words are separated.

These are often referred to as naming conventions, and there are a few of them. I will present them here, so that I can refer to them later in the Pydon't.

The list that follows is not comprehensive, in that there are more naming conventions out there. However, they are not relevant for this article.

• CAPSLOCK – all letters of all words are upper case and there is nothing to separate consecutive words;
• CAPS_LOCK_WITH_UNDERSCORES – like the one above, but with underscores separating words;
• lowercase – all letteres of all words are lower case and there is nothing to separate consecutive words;
• snake_case – like the one above, but with underscores separating words;
• PascalCase – all words are put together, but their initials are capitalised to help you know where one word ends and the other begins; and
• camelCase – like the one above, except the very first word starts with a lower case letter as well.

On top of these naming conventions, sometimes leading and/or trailing underscores can be added to the mix. That isn't strictly related to the naming conventions by themselves, but it is related to the way Python uses names. In case you need a refresher, I wrote a Pydon't that teaches you all the usages of underscore and, in particular, it tells you what the underscores do for you if in the beginning and/or end of a name.

# PEP 8 recommendations

PEP 8 is a document – a Python Enhancement Proposal – that contains a style guide for Python, and it is the most widely accepted and used style guide for Python. In case you don't know it, it might be worth taking a look at it.

PEP 8 starts by acknowledging that “the naming conventions of Python's library are a bit of a mess”, so bear in mind that if you start working on some project that already uses a specific naming convention, you should stick to it. Remember that being consistent is more important than following the PEP 8 guide.

## PascalCase

You can find the PascalCase convention often on classes. That is the most common use case for this convention.

What this means is that your classes will look like:

class Shape:
# ...

class Circle(Shape):
# ...

and

class GameArena:
# ...

class HumanPlayer:
# ...

class NPC:
# ...

class AIPlayer:
# ...

Notice that the NPC and AIPlayer classes are actually using acronyms: NPC stands for non-playable character and AI stands for artificial intelligence. PEP 8 recommends that you capitalise all letters of an acronym in a PascalCase name. Sometimes this makes it look like we are using the CAPSLOCK convention.

Other common use cases for the PascalCase convention include exceptions – which shouldn't surprise you because exceptions come from classes –, and type variables.

## snake_case

The snake_case naming convention is the bread and butter of naming in Python. Variables, functions, methods, arguments, they all use the snake_case convention.

So, prefer

def cool_function(cool_argument, optional_info):
# ...

to things like

def coolFunction(coolargument, optionalinfo):
# ...

def CoolFunction(coolArgument, optionalInfo):
# ...

def COOL_FUNCTION(cool_argument, optional_info):
# ...

As an additional note, PEP 8 also recommends that you append an underscore to a name that you want to use, when that name is a keyword. So, for example, you cannot have a variable called for, but you could call it for_.

## CAPS_LOCK_WITH_UNDERSCORES

This naming convention, that might look a bit clunky to you, is actually used to represent global constants. Python doesn't have support for variables that are truly constant – in the sense that trying to change them would throw an error – and so we use this widely adopted convention that variables that are used as global constants are named with the CAPS_LOCK_WITH_UNDERSCORES convention.

Generally, you will find these “constants” in the beginning of a file.

For example, I often have a couple of paths defined this way:

IMG_BIN = "images"
LOG_FILE = "logs/app.log"

# ...

# Standard names

There are a few cases where certain names are the golden standard in those situations.

## self

A great example of that is the name of the first argument to instance methods. The first argument of such a method is always self.

Therefore, do

class Square:
def __init__(self, side_length):
# ...

class Square:
def __init__(square, side_length):
# ...

class Square:
def __init__(a, b):
# ...

class Square:
def __init__(bananas, side_length):
# ...

Notice that all three alternatives above (that I claim you should avoid) are actually functional. Here is an example:

>>> class Square:
...     def __init__(a, b):
...         a.side_length = b
...
>>> sq = Square(10)
>>> sq.side_length
10

However, they look utterly wrong to any (!?) Python programmer worth their salt. Ok, let's not get fundamental here, it's just a matter of respecting the one Python convention that is probably the most widely used.

## cls

In a similar setting, cls is the widely accepted name for class methods.

Why is that? Well, class is a keyword so we can't really have that as the parameter name. And for some reason, people started sticking to cls instead of something like class_. So, nowadays, class methods have their first parameter be cls.

A great example of a class method is the method dict.fromkeys, which you call to initialise a dictionary in a different way:

>>> dict.fromkeys("abc")
{'a': None, 'b': None, 'c': None}

Class methods are often used to implement different ways of building instances of your classes, and that's precisely what is happening in the previous example: we are creating a dictionary (or, in other words, an instance of the class dict) in a different way from what is the usual way.

# Verbosity

Having discussed some of the most widely spread conventions when dealing with names in Python, I will now share my experience regarding good naming principles.

One thing that is often object of many worries is the length of the name you are picking. Should you pick a long name that contains much information but is a pain to type? Should you pick a short name that is easy to type but a pain to recall what it is for?

Balance is key, always.

Remember that Python imposes a soft limit on the maximum length of a line, so if your variables look like

number_of_times_user_tried_to_login_unsuccessfully = 2

then you won't be able to do much in each line of code you write.

However, if you go down the other extreme, you end up with names that are one, two, three characters long, and those names won't tell you anything.

There are two metrics that you can use to help you decide how long a name should be:

1. the number of times a name is used; and
2. the distance between definition of the name and its usage.

What do these things mean?

If a name is used very often, because it is a function that you call all the time or maybe a variable that you need to access very frequently, then that name can be shorter, because you are always aware of the existence and purpose of that name.

On the other hand, if a name is rarely used, then the name should be longer, because you will need more help to remember what is the purpose of that name.

The reasoning behind bullet point 2. is similar. If you define a name and use it right after it was defined, then it's purpose will be fresh in your memory, and you might be able to afford a shorter name.

On the other hand, if you define a name – like a function or a variable – and only use it far down the file, or even in other files or modules, then it is probably best if you use a longer, more descriptive name.

## One-char names

At one of the ends of the spectrum are one-character names. One-character names consist of a letter, either uppercase or lowercase, or the underscore.

One-character names should generally be avoided, because they contain little to no information about what they refer to. However, there are a couple of exceptions that make some sense in their given contexts.

Whenever you need to assign to a variable, even though you don't need its value, you could use a sink, and the one-character name _ is the recommended variable name for a sink. A sink is a variable that is assigned to even though we don't care about its value. An example of a sink shows up in unpacking, when you care about the first and last elements of a list, but not about the middle:

>>> l = [42, 10, 20, 73]
>>> first, *_, last = l
>>> first
42
>>> last
73

In numerical contexts, n is also a common name for an integer and x for a real number (a float). This might seem silly, but it is recommended that you do not use n for values that might not be whole integers. People get so used to these conventions that breaking them might mean that understanding your code will take much longer.

c and z are also occasionally used for complex numbers, but those are conventions that come from the world of mathematics. In other words, these conventions are more likely to be followed by people that are close to mathematics/mathematicians.

Still along the lines of conventions drawn from mathematics, i, j, and k, in this order, are often used for (integer) indices. For example, you often see the following beginning of a for loop:

for i in range(n):
pass

j and k are then used for nested loops, or for when i is already referring to another fixed index:

for i in range(...):
for j in range(...):
for k in range(...):
pass

Other common one-character names include the first letters of built-in types: d for dictionaries, s for sets or strings, and l for lists.

However, l is a particularly bad one-character name, and so are I (capital i) and O, (capital o), because for many fonts, these characters are easily mistaken by the numbers one and zero.

One-character names should only be used if the surrounding context clearly validates what the names refer to. For example, s will be a terrible one-character name if you are dealing with sets and strings in the same place.

Finally, you can try to use other short names to replace the one-character names. For example, idx instead of i makes it clearer that we are talking about an index, and char instead of c makes it clearer that we are talking about a character.

## Abbreviations

Abbreviations need to be used sparingly. They might make sense if it is a widely recognise abbreviation... But that, itself, is a dangerous game to play, because you cannot know what abbreviations the readers of your code might know.

Something that might be safer is to use abbreviations that are relative to the domain knowledge of the code. For example, if your code handles a network of logistics drones, at some point it might make sense to use “eta” – which stands for “estimated time of arrival” – for a variable name that holds the estimated time of arrival of a drone. But then again, try to reason about whether the readers of your code will be familiar with the domain-specific lingo or not.

While this first guideline is fairly subjective, there is one type of abbreviation that is definitely a terrible idea, and that's non-standard abbreviations. If you can't Google that abbreviation and get its meaning in the first couple of results, then that's not a standard abbreviation, at all.

For example, taking the long variable name from above and abbreviating it is a bad idea:

# Don't

# but this is even worse:
ntutlu = 2

This also has the inconvenience that it is not a name that you can pronounce, and that makes it harder for you to talk about your code with others.

On the flip side, there is also a very specific situation in which non-standard abbreviations can make sense, and that is in short-lived scopes. A prototypical example arises from iterating over a collection:

data_sets = [ds for ds in data_sets if not is_complete(ds)]

Notice that there is a container, a list, with a name in the plural: data_sets. Then, as we traverse through that container, what do we expect each element to be? Because the container is called data_sets, we immediately expect it to contain, well, data sets. Therefore, each element is naturally thought of as a single data set. As an extension to that, the name ds – that abbreviates “data set” – is a perfectly acceptable name for the consecutive elements of data_sets, as that name only lives inside the list comprehension.

## Sentences

Rather than having names like

number_of_times_user_tried_to_login_unsuccessfully = 2

or

def compute_number_of_unsuccessful_login_attempts():
pass

consider shortening those names, and instead include a comment that gives further context, if needed. As you will see, more often than not, you don't even need the extra comment:

# Number of unsuccessful attempts made by the user:
unsuccessful_logins = 2

I mean, we are clearly working with a number, so we can just write:

# Unsuccessful attempts made by the user:
unsuccessful_logins = 2

We also know we are talking about unsuccessful attempts, because that's in the variable name:

# Attempts made by the user:
unsuccessful_logins = 2

We can, either stop at this point, or remove the comment altogether if the user is the only entity that could have made login attempts.

For functions, include the extra context in the docstring. This ensures that that helpful context is shown to you/users when using calling your function. Nowadays, IDEs will show the docstring of the functions we are calling in our code.

# Picking a name

When picking the actual name for whatever it is that you need to name, remember to:

• pick a name that is consistent in style/wording with your surroundings;
• use always the same vocabulary and spelling;
# Bad:
first_color = "red"
last_colour = "blue"

# Good:
first_colour = "red"
last_colour = "blue"
# (or use color in both)

item.has_promotion = True
item.discount_percentage = 30

# Good:
item.has_discount = True    # or item.is_discounted, for example.
item.discount_percentage = 30
• use a name that reflects what we are dealing with, instead of a generic name that reflects the type of the data.
# Bad:
num = 18
string = "Hello, there."

# Good:
legal_age = 18
greeting = "Hello, there."

For variables, you can also consider a name that reflects a major invariant property of the entity you are working with. “Invariant” means that it doesn't change. This is important, otherwise you will have a name that indicates something when the value itself is something else. I'll show you an example of this by the end of the Pydon't.

## Naming functions and methods

A guideline that is specific for functions/methods is that they should be named with verbs. This reflects the action that the function/method will do when called and makes it clear that things happen when the function/method is called.

## Naming variables

Similarly, variables are better named with nouns, when they refer to entities.

For Boolean variables (also known as predicates), adjectives might be a good choice as well, in the sense that the value of the Boolean reflects the presence or absence of that adjective.

For example:

if painting.colourful:
print("I like colours!")

Notice that the noun “painting” leads us into assuming we are talking about some object that may be an instance of some class Painting that was created earlier, and painting.colourful leads us into assuming that that's a Boolean value indicating whether or not the painting is colourful.

Notice how redundant the paragraph above was. When the names used in the code are good, English explanations become easily too verbose. That's a good thing, it means that the code speaks for itself.

Having variables be names/adjectives and functions be verbs improves readability when you call functions on your own variables, because the function (the verb) will be acting on the variables (the nouns). That's exactly how English and most natural languages work, and thus we are writing our code in a way that is similar to natural languages.

# Context is key

This has been mentioned heavily throughout this Pydon't, but I want it to be highlighted even more, so there's a heading devoted to just this: context is key.

Remember that the context in which you are writing your code will impact a lot the names that you pick.

Contexts that matter include the domain(s) that your code belongs to (are you writing software to handle bank transactions, to manage a network of logistics drones, or are you implementing a game?), the specific module and functions you are in, and whether or not you are inside a statement like a loop, a list comprehension, or a try: ... except: ... block.

As an example of how the domain you are working in can drastically affect your naming, consider the following example, drawn from my experience with mathematics. Sometimes it is useful to be able to add polynomials, and therefore you might want to implement that function:

def poly_addition(poly1, poly2):
pass

However, if you are in the context of a module that specialises in working with polynomials, then that function's signature could probably be boiled down to:

def add(p, q):
pass

(p and q are common names for polynomials in mathematics.)

See? Context is key.

# Practical example

In my Pydon'ts talk and in the Pydon't about refactoring, I showed a piece of code written by a beginner and then proceeded to refactor it little by little. One of the steps was renaming things.

Here is said piece of code:

def myfunc(a):
empty = []
for i in range(len(a)):
if i % 2 == 0:
empty.append(a[i].upper())
else:
empty.append(a[i].lower())

return "".join(empty)

This is what the code does:

>>> myfunc("abcdef")
'AbCdEf'
>>> myfunc("ABCDEF")
'AbCdEf'
>>> myfunc("A CDEF")
'A CdEf'

It alternates the casing of the characters of the argument.

As an exercise for you, try improving the names in the piece of code above before you keep reading.

Ok, have you had a go at improving the names?

Here are all of the names that show up in the function above:

• myfunc is the function name;
• a is the parameter of the function;
• empty is a list that grows with the new characters of the result; and
• i is the index into the argument string.

Here is a suggestion of improvement:

def alternate_casing(text):
letters = []
for idx in range(len(text)):
if idx % 2 == 0:
letters.append(text[idx].upper())
else:
letters.append(text[idx].lower())

return "".join(letters)

## myfunc is now alternate_casing

myfunc was a generic name for a function and it gave you no information whatsoever as to what the function did.

Instead, we can pick a name like alternate_casing that tells you that this function will alternate the casing of its argument.

Notice that we did not go for something like

def alternate_casing_starting_with_uppercase(...):
pass

That implementation detail is better suited for the docstring of the function.

## a is now text

Our function accepts a generic string as input. There is nothing particularly special or interesting about this string, so perfectly good names include text and string.

I opted for text because it gives off the feeling that we will be working with human-readable strings.

## empty is now letters

The variable name empty here is a great counter-example of one of the guidelines presented before. This Pydon't suggested that you give variable names according to important invariant properties of your objects.

Well, [] is clearly an empty list, and so the author decided to name this variable as empty, which actually looks sensible. However, three lines down, that list is appended to consecutively, so it stops being empty rather quickly. Therefore, the list being empty is not an invariant property and also not a good name.

The name letters is more appropriate than empty, but you might argue that it might be misleading – after all, we put all characters in there, not just the letters.

What name would you use, then?

## i is now idx

i is a very typical name for an index and I don't think there was anything wrong with it. I have a personal preference for the 110% explicit idx for an index, and that is why I went with it.

# Conclusion

Having gone through this Pydon't, you might be thinking that most of the guidelines in here are fairly subjective, and you are right!

I know it can be frustrating to not have objective rules to pick names for your variables, functions, etc... But you know what they say! Naming things is the hardest problem you have to solve in programming.

Don't fret, with experience you will become better and better at using good names in your code, and remember, Python reads almost like English, so the names you pick should help with that.

Here's the main takeaway of this Pydon't, for you, on a silver platter:

While naming can be hard, there are guidelines to help you make the best decisions possible.

This Pydon't showed you that:

• consistency with existing code is paramount in naming things;
• pick up all the hints you can from the context to determine the best names;
• PEP 8 suggests some naming conventions for your code,
• most notably snake_case for almost everything; and
• PascalCase for classes and exceptions.
• CAPS_WITH_UNDERSCORE is a widely accepted convention for global constants;
• variables should be named with nouns, Boolean variables sometimes with adjectives, and functions with verbs;

If you liked this Pydon't be sure to leave a reaction below and share this with your friends and fellow Pythonistas. Also, don't forget to subscribe to the newsletter so you don't miss a single Pydon't!

I hope you learned something new! If you did, consider following the footsteps of the readers who bought me a slice of pizza 🍕. Your small contribution helps me produce this content for free and without spamming you with annoying ads.